Alright, so maybe this isn't a "classic" that your english teacher would have assigned, but what do english teachers know? They're all too caught up in nonsense like Wuthering Heights and Madame Bovary to actually read something interesting. Man-eating plants, on the other hand, are very interesting!
In The Day of the Triffids a meteor shower thrills the world with a beautiful bright green show. But the next morning dawns with the realization that everyone who watched (all but a very few) is now blind. Bill Masen, a biologist, was in the hospital with his eyes bandaged due to an accident. Bill works with a new species of plant known as triffids, which are cultivated for their oils but also highly dangerous for their carnivorous nature and surprising ability to wander about. They have a deadly whip-like poisonous stinger allowing them to quickly kill their prey and seem to possess some degree of intelligence. As London, and presumably the entire world, sinks into chaos people begin forming into groups. But the triffids are always on the periphery, patiently waiting for opportunities, and they seem to be the only creatures truly able to flourish in this new world.
I've been interested in carnivorous plants since I was a kid and heard of The Day of the Triffids many times. I thought it was just a cheesy sci-fi B movie - I didn't realize it was a book first. I'm not usually a fan of science fiction or horror, but was surprised by how much I enjoyed this story. The description of how the triffids came to be so widespread was fascinating and frightening, and I could imagine myself as a boy doing the same innocent and naive things as the main character. The story remains vague on their origin, speculating they were bred in the Soviet Union, and reflects the secrecy and mistrust developing in 1951 when this book was written and the Cold War was shifting into high gear. (The way the seeds blew around put a creepy twist on Weslandia, a favorite children's book at our house.)
But as an end-of-the-world story the social questions raised are particularly interesting. What is right and wrong when the social order breaks down? Is looting justified? Who should be in charge? What obligation do the sighted have to the sightless? And as groups and tribes begin to establish, what moral responsibilities do they have to others? The issue of polygamy is even raised to some objections, but not as many as you might expect. The characters also speculate on the nature of the meteor shower - was it an act of God, or maybe an accident involving the radioactive weapons then being developed? And as it becomes apparent just how serious of a threat the triffids are, they seem to be yet another obstacle to re-establishing a new civilization... or are they?
Another interesting facet, given that the book was written soon after World War II, was the frequent expectation that "someone" would come to save them, probably America and probably as a result of the large role the Marshall Plan had played in rebuilding Europe in the post-war years. But other characters advocate self-reliance as it was likely the US had experienced the same catastrophe. Some readers have complained of the antiquated view of womanhood in the book, but this is most likely a reflection of a time when women weren't so common in the workplace, although one character takes a stand for their untapped capabilities. I found it odd that there wasn't much discussion on why certain people missed the meteor showers - people always talk about "where" they were when disasters happen - but I guess that probably would have just added a lot of unecessary dialog.
I didn't expect to enjoy this book as much as I did. Enough questions are left unanswered and explanations somewhat vague to make it a frightening consideration. It's a clever and insightful look at social conditions and evidently still very influential (I was reminded strongly of the new Gone series by Michael Grant as well as the older Lord of the Flies). I listened to the audio book read by Samuel West who does a very good job with the different accents, although his volume goes up and down excessively sometimes. But still, I recommend it as a more interesting alternative to that James Joyce and Jane Austen nonsense teachers made us read.
Jane Austen nonsense? Oh, for the love of...
ReplyDeleteAt any rate, this book reminds me of Little Shop of Horrors. Ever seen it?
LOL! That comment was just for you, you know. I have seen Little Shop of Horrors but that is pure camp and this wasn't anything like that. The plants are mostly peripheral to the end-of-the-world plotline, but tied in very cleverly.
ReplyDeleteActually, I once tried to read Jane Austen. I couldn't get beyond the overuse of the word "insufferable." Everything it seemed - especially Mr. Darcy - was simply "unsufferable."
First-time visitor...love the design.
ReplyDeleteJust hopping by....
Stop by my blog if you get a chance for reviews on I'd Know you Anywhere by Laura Lippman, Saving Cee Cee Honeycut by Beth Hoffman, Room by Emma Donoghue, and many others.
Happy Hopping, Everyone....hop on over to my blog to see who my favorite blogs are.
http://silversolara.blogspot.com
This sounds surprisingly interesting! Thanks for the review.
ReplyDeleteSarah @ Loving Books
I can't say that I have any interest in carnivorous plants, but I love how much of your voice/personality comes out in your writing. Makes even something I'm not interested in sound exciting.
ReplyDeleteGlad to have found you via the Hop!
I'm stopping in via the Hop!
ReplyDeleteI'm a new follower.
I'd love to have you stop by my blog:
www.readerbuzz.blogspot.com